Free (If you don’t count that your privacy was already violated) Credit Reporting for up to Nine Months…

Transunion Credit Reporting Agency was very naughty.  If you held a credit card between January 1, 1987 to May 28, 2008 they sold our information to businesses without our permission.  As a result people filed lawsuits, which were combined into a class action, and a settlement has now been worked out.

Since we weren’t the ones who filed the lawsuit, or lawyers for either side, we are not going to get a brazilian dollars.  Dadgummit.

We can, however, get free credit monitoring for up to 9 months, depending on the option we choose, beginning after the case and appeals is settled.

You can choose one of these options:

1.  Free credit report monitoring for six months, plus cash if there’s any money left over in settlement fund and you still get to sue them if you want;

2.  All the benefits of option one but you can’t sue them any further, or

3.  Nine months of credit monitoring, access to some free credit scores, and free use of TransUnion’s mortgage simulator service – but no cash payment.

Today is the last day to register to take part, so head here to register or call 1-866-416-3470.

Advertisement

Shame on you, Citibank

Between 1992 and 2003, Citibank operated an “automatic sweeping” program that would without notice remove positive balances from customers’ credit card accounts—mainly those of the poor and the recently deceased—and pocketing the money. Now it’s been ordered to pay back $14 million dollars to the affected customers, plus another $3.5 million in penalties to California, thanks to California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr..

According to the article, in July of 2001 a Citibank employee uncovered the practice and brought it to the attention of his superiors. The employee was later fired for discussing the credit sweeps with an internal audit team. Niiiiiiiiiiice.

In one of the most outrageous examples of gargantuan kahunas and at the same time an obvious effort to win the Biggest Asshat of the Year contest, one executive apparently said (according to the press release of the California Attorney General), “Stealing from our customers is a business decision, not a legal decision.” The same executive later said that the sweep program could not be stopped because it would reduce the executive bonus pool.

And we wonder why the average American hates corporations.

So now Citibank has to pay back the money (they say they’ve already started). And their penalty for stealing from their customers?

Well, the state gets $3.5 million. And they should.

The affected customers? They get the amount that was stolen plus 10% interest.

Ten percent?

This was a broad conspiracy to commit theft, and abuse of fiduciary responsibility! It wasn’t a corporation that made this decision, it was flesh and blood men and women who made a decision to abuse their position of trust for their own profit. The executives responsible should be prosecuted criminally for their deeds.

And the whistleblower should be compensated handsomely. Unlike Citibank customers.

A ten percent penalty? That’s barely interest on a loan, and this was no loan. This wasn’t punishment. Forget “slap on the wrist”. This is more like a light breeze, without even enough power to make the hair on their wrists move. Gee, that will make Citibank and others who have engaged in this same type of deception quiver. Methinks there is the sound of laughter, popping corks and the tinkle of champagne glasses being clinked going on in the Citibank boardroom this week.

Attorney General Bob Butterworth, are you listening? Did this happen here in Florida, too? If so, I hope you pursue it.

And I hope you make Citibank really pay.

Lindsay Lohan

Lindsay Lohan has had many troubles lately, most of them her own doing. The substance abuse monkey is a very difficult one to try to get off your back, and the bad decisions one makes as a result of intoxication, self-hatred and general apathy can have far-reaching consequences.

But some of Lindsay’s troubles aren’t of her own doing. There are many who want to take advantage of her, and her deep pockets.

In October of 2005 Lindsay was involved in a car accident with one Raymundo Ortega. The California Highway Patrol determined that Mr. Ortega was responsible for the accident, having made an illegal U-turn. Nevertheless, Mr. Ortega, a busboy, felt that it was moral and just to sue Lindsay for $200,000 because she had the nerve to be there when he made his illegal U-turn. He alleges that she was fleeing paparazzi (not a crime) and drinking (likely, but there’s no evidence).

Lindsay settled the lawsuit with Mr. Ortega, but I really wish she hadn’t. I’m sure he didn’t get $200,000 from her, but he didn’t deserve a penny. Not one cent.

These types of cases really get my panties in a twist. The burglar who sues you because he gets stuck in your garage while breaking into your house. The kid climbs the fence to break into the pool area and breaks his neck diving in. The woman who sues the apartment complex because she gets bit by a dog in the park across the street.

Those people have kahunas. Great big mirrored brass ones.

I don’t have an issue with suing the truly responsible party if you are injured permanently or suffered greatly or lost money due to someone else’s negligence. But I shouldn’t have to pay someone who got hurt because of their own. Neither should Lindsay. And neither should you.

Yet another reason to get a Personal Liability Umbrella.

Why You Should Consider a Personal Liability Umbrella

My father is part-owner of an apartment complex where tenants are not permitted to have pets. The complex was sued by a woman who was bitten by a dog that was owned by a friend of a tenant, and the bite happened in a park across the street from the apartments.

No way she’d win, right?

Wrong.

It burns me. It really burns me. The woman’s attorney successfully argued that because a brochure for the apartment complex had a picture of the park and mentioned that it was across the street from the apartments that the complex made it a defacto part of the complex. The woman was award over $300,000 for a very minor bite, plus attorney fees.

It is just so wrong, on so many different levels.

But that’s a corporation, right? Not something us individuals need to worry about, is it?

I think we do need to worry about it.

We live in a litigious society (though I have high hopes that somewhere, perhaps in Utah, it may be slightly less litigious than it is here in South Florida). In the first five minutes after I met one of my neighbors she mentioned three people she was suing (you can bet she has never been invited inside my house!).

The example I gave is of a corporation that got shafted, but ordinary citizens have to defend themselves against lawsuits every day of the week.

Everyone knows about cases like these:

• Kids Play – One person kneels behind another and a third pushes the “victim” over. In a recent case three 10-year olds were the players. One child broke his arm and the other two were sued. The case cost the kneeling boy $100,000 and the one who did the pushing $195,000.
• The Clumsy Worker – A 40-year-old window washer broke his heel in a fall after a downspout he was holding onto broke away from the house on which he was working. Although the worker was found partially responsible, the fall cost the homeowner $1.2 million.
• The Accidental Athlete – A 22-year old suffered permanent eye damage when he was struck by a golf
  ball. He sued claiming that the golfer who hit the ball had failed to look out for other players. The errant shot cost the golfer $160,000.
• Not-So-Funny Ski Bunny – A professional dancer suffered permanent knee damage — an end to her
  career—when she was knocked down on a beginner’s ski slope. She offered to settle for the $300,000 covered by the defendant’s insurance, but was rebuffed. The case went to trial, where it cost the defendant $2.2 million.
• Pool Tragedy – At an end-of-school swim party, a 16-year old dove and hit his head on the bottom of the pool. He became a quadriplegic, and the case resulted in a $1.5 million settlement against the homeowner.

Then there are the car accidents where someone is seriously, permanently injured, or the damage to the house down the street when your kid throws three dozen eggs at it on Mischief Night.

Horrible things. Such tragedies.

If I’m responsible I want to have the money to help people who are hurt – it’s the right thing to do. And if it’s a frivolous lawsuit I want to be able to defend myself without going bankrupt. We think that because we’re right, morally right, common sense-ally right, we’ll win. Not necessarily. Very not necessarily. And that’s shocking, isn’t it?

Whether I’m responsible or not I don’t want to have to give up everything I own to defend myself or pay a judgment. The way I see it we’ve worked way, waaaay too hard to stay out of debt and build up our savings and a few assets to give it all away to someone else. So, that’s why I think I’m finally going to buy a Personal Liability Umbrella.

A Personal Liability Umbrella policy provides an extra layer of liability coverage (usually starting at $1 million) over and above what the limit of liability on each of your underlying personal liability policies (i.e. homeowners, personal automobile, boat-owners, motorcycle, etc).

The policy covers “personal injury” liability such as bodily injury, property damage, sickness, disease, disability, mental anguish, false imprisonment, wrongful entry, libel, slander, humiliation, defamation of character, invasion of privacy, etc. The coverage is often broader than what would be covered on your underlying policy, as a typical Homeowners policy covers only “bodily injury” and “property damage” liability. So, if for example you are sued for making an allegedly libelous statement about someone in the newspaper, that would be excluded by your underlying Homeowners policy, but covered by the Personal Liability Umbrella policy, up to the limit of the policy.

Perhaps the most valuable aspect of a Personal Liability Umbrella is the coverage for the cost of defense of lawsuits. In addition to the $1 million liability, most Personal Liability Umbrella policies also pay for defense of suits that are not payable by the underlying policies, all expenses incurred by the insurance company, all costs taxed against the insured, premiums for appeal bonds, reasonable expenses incurred by the insured at the insurance company’s request, and interest on unpaid judgments.

The cost? About the same as one hour of an attorney’s time per year. One hour.

So, who should have one?

• Do you own your home or condo?
• Do you have children?
• Is there a teenage driver in the family?
• Do babysitters or cleaning people work in your home?
• Do you have a swimming pool?
• Do you ever leave your home in the care of a housesitter?
• Do you regularly ferry other people’s kids around in your car?
• Do you have a dog, snake, ferret or other pet?
• Are you active in sports, such as golf, biking, skiing, or mountain climbing? Do you own a boat?
• Do you own rental property?

In most cases, the more often you answer yes, the more likely you need an Umbrella policy. But for some people, one “yes” answer is all it takes. For example, lots of people who can’t sell their homes in the current market are renting them to others. I would absolutely, positively not even consider renting out any property I own without having an Umbrella in place.

Talk to your insurance agent for some more info. Most companies will only write the policy if you have your home and/or auto insured with them. And I may have to increase my auto coverages to qualify for one (my company requires that my auto liability limits be $250,000 per person/$500,000 per accident), but that’s okay.

Now I won’t have to worry if someone leaves my house with a cup of hot coffee in their crotch, spills it and sues me. Because, you know, I was really losing a lot of sleep worrying about that.

The preceding information is not advice, it’s just my thoughts and opinions. I’m just a girl on the web, not currently licensed in insurance or anything else in any state. You should absolutely seek the counsel of an insurance agent licensed in your state before taking any action at all. Coverages and programs discussed may or may not be available in your state.

Did you like this article? Be sure to check out my other articles on insurance:

Auto Insurance 101: Part 1 ~ Before We Shop Let’s Understand What We Have

Auto Insurance 101: Part 2 ~ 10 Tips for Shopping Smart

Auto Insurance 101: Part 3 ~ What to Do With The Quotes Now That You Have Them